“WUWT makes a difference – London Science Museum changes their climate change exhibit“. Anthony is delighted that he was able to hijack an unscientific online poll at the London Science Museum. That’s the denialist raison d’être; make enough noise to attract notice, throw out enough misrepresentations to drown the honest science.
The Times is happy to throw its weight behind the hijack with this article: Public scepticism prompts Science Museum to rename climate exhibition. Just as it did with Jonathan Leake’s false accusation of the IPCC about the Amazon rainforest’s response to drought.
Funny, the vote chart doesn't show the early voting trend, before the denialist hijack. Cherry-picking?
Wott's Up With That? 
Here’s an interesting story from Left Foot Forward:
http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/03/science-museum-climate-sceptic-exhibition-sponsored-by-big-oil/
“Science Museum climate sceptic exhibition sponsored by Big Oil”
£4 million, to be more precise. I
[I think I inadvertently deleted part of your comment. Sorry! I think a Museum spokesperson has indicated that they are still presenting the “mainstream” climate concern. The “they blinked!” line has been oversold by the denialists. See Climate Progress here. – Ben]
“I think I inadvertently deleted part of your comment. Sorry! ”
Crikey, Ben, what were you thinking? I’m not even a climatologist ;)