“Spiegel does 8 part series on current state of climate research“. Anthony Watts tells us about this Spiegel Online article series that ” features Steve McIntyre prominently, and [is] well worth the read.”
The series starts with an already out-dated credulous rehash of the Climategate “scandal”. I guess it is a “worth the read” if you want to return to the time when wishful thinking could allow denialists to think that Climategate was merely a baseless political attack and not a completely rejected baseless political attack.
The remaining articles are a weakly argued denialist gruel of innuendo and mischaracterization (“alarmists” and the “levelheaded”) that heavily and uncritically quotes denialist pundits and “researchers”. Entertaining perhaps, but neither accurate nor insightful. Too bad.
Wott's Up With That? 
I skimmed through the comments over at WTFWT on this article (as long as I could stomach them) and my belief that the cumulative IQ over there is mid-two-digits is confirmed.
The choir is just as idiotic as they were when I first went there. Watts definitely has the troglodyte portion of humanity eating from his, ahhh, hand.
[Time in the WTWT comments is hard time. – Ben]
Yeah, I took a minute to read all the comments here and found the IQ level to be on a whole other level than that at the real WUWT.
But what do you think of that stuff from the right-wing denialist rag, Der Spiegel?
Do a search on the name “barry” to read his thoughtful and worthwhile comments, and the replies. In reply to an inline comment top one of barry’s posts, I wrote:”REPLY: Well unlike you, we at least put our names to our work. I’m never much impressed by lecturing from anonymous cowards. – A”
Smokescreen. How about addressing the issue?