“New peer reviewed paper shows just how bad the climate models really are“. Ah yes, when I look for compelling climate science, I always turn to the civil engineers at Hydrological Sciences Journal. Just like Anthony Watts. Hey, it’s peer-reviewed! The author’s conclusion? Computer models suck.
So is anyone claiming that global climate models are perfect? Is anyone claiming that they are useful on a local or regional scale? Nope and nope.
Were the models really never compared against the past record? Of course they were! It’s how they were frickin’ developed.
So, what’s better? Still waiting for a credible devastating analysis of “the consensus”.
P.S. I’m just eyeballing things here, but don’t the paper’s temperature charts show an upward trend?