“Quote of the week #34: NASA doubts climate model certainty“. Anthony Watts wants you to believe that because a NASA pamphlet from 1998 is not “completely certain” about Global Warming, they must now be taking orders from the secret Al Gore gubmint. It’s called science, Anthony. Better data, better understanding, better conclusions. Is that a difficult concept?
It’s the denialist mind that is frozen in time and unable to process new information. That’s why they’re called denialists.
Anthony’s also jumping onto this month’s denialist theme that “historic temperatures can be modeled with a constant linear trend + a 60 year cycle.” Too bad they can’t actually explain the correlation, too bad the correlation doesn’t persist, too bad the “constant linear trend” is up (what’s behind that I wonder).
Wott's Up With That? 
Yeah, I remember reading the paper a few months ago. They admitted that they couldn’t account for the cycle by any physical mechanism. My thought was that there is far too little data to find a cycle of that length.