Are Gulf Of Mexico Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies Near To Record Levels?

Are Gulf Of Mexico Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies Near To Record Levels?” As Anthony Watts foolishly suggests in his one sentence contribution to Bob Tisdale’s guest post, “the devil is in the details.” He is indeed…

Bob is trying to dispute the claim by meteorologist Jeff Masters that the recent Midwest deluge [was] enhanced by near-record Gulf of Mexico sea surface temperatures. Although Jeff is talking about weather, Bob Tisdale recognizes the threat. This might mean that global warming really is happening! Of course it’s not, so he accuses Jeff of  a “contrived” claim and counters that “…over the past 80 years, there is no global warming signal in the Gulf of Mexico SST data.”

My blue trend is just eyeballing but it's a lot less contrived than Bob Tisdale's flat red line in this example from his "analysis".

Unfortunately for Bob any open-eyed reader will see that every chart he tries to use as evidence reveals that he has deliberately picked dishonest comparison points that minimize the increase and he has ignored everything in-between. Details, details.

Statistics, Bob. Look into ’em. There’s a reason scientists use ’em.

5 thoughts on “Are Gulf Of Mexico Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies Near To Record Levels?

  1. Thank God Corexit prevented the “black” crude from absorbing even more energy to the surface layer! But clearly there was some left since the flood isn’t related to global warming at all.

  2. Pingback: The Silliest Rebuttal Yet From Ben At Wott’sUpWithThat | Bob Tisdale – Climate Observations

  3. I’ve made many comments in the past pointing out the presence in the data of the global temperature pattern…in WUWT graphs that are given straight line interpretations.

    Ordinarily I only look for the last three lengths in the global temperature graph: up to 1943, haphazardly down to 1976, and then up again.
    There are more.

    Global Temperature Anomalies, degC, 5 year average,
    read from graph on screen. End eyeballing here justified by the crudities in the visual analysis.

    [1880 -0.28 eyeballed beginning of global graph]
    down
    1892 -0.37 low
    up
    1898 -0.24 high
    down
    [1900 -0.26 beginning of century]
    down
    1908 -0.42 overall low
    up
    1943 +0.03 high
    down
    1950 -0.13 first of 3 lows surrounding 1960
    up
    1960 -0.03 interim high
    down
    1976 -0.08
    up
    [2000 +0.37 end of century]
    up
    2010 +0.49 eyeballed end of global graph

    Obviously this is ad hoc and not rigorous. And not convincing for those who don’t take the time to try it.

    But, while subjectively objective, and despite exceptions, I see more of the global temperature pattern in the Gulf of Mexico graphs.

    SHOW DON’T TELL…………………….The obvious next step is to reduce the global temperature graphi’s vertical height to match the Gulf of Mexico graph. And to make the horizontal scales the same.

    And overlay the one on the other.

  4. This visual analysis will be easier to do from a shortened listing of the global temperature pattern, in the same eight segments.

    A paper copy of this would make it easier to use, because of all the back-and-forthing. As would a print out of the original global temperature graph.

    Beginning in 1880
    down till 1892 low
    up till 1898 high
    down till 1908 overall low
    up till 1943 high
    down till 1950 low
    up till 1960 interim high
    down,up,down till 1976 low
    up till 2010 overall high

    Trying it out on Figures 11 and 15 suggests that an overlay of global temperature would be successful.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s