WUWT-TV’s answer to Al Gore’s ‘Dirty Weather Report’ is ON THE AIR

Posted on by

“WUWT-TV’s answer to Al Gore’s ‘Dirty Weather Report’ is ON THE AIR” (2012-11-14). One word: painfully amateur. OK, that’s two words. It’s going to be a useful resource though, a concise compendium of dumb-ass blow-hards that won’t be able to squirm away from their claims.

The constant technical stumbles actually make Anthony Watts’ F*CKUP-TV look better than it is though. Surely they meant to say something else? Something intelligent? They just lost their notes, right?

Production values, denialist-style.

Gore’s Climate Reality show pales in comparison!

So who paid the $10,000+ for Anthony’s web setup? Not to mention the bandwidth costs.  He’s being coy about that…

4 thoughts on “WUWT-TV’s answer to Al Gore’s ‘Dirty Weather Report’ is ON THE AIR”

  1. Of course he’s being coy: however, I’d replace “coy” with “hypocritical,” given how much shiite he’s given climate scientists (yannow..the ones who actually KNOW the science?) about being “transparent” (they have) and “not disclosing their funding sources (they have).

    To Wattsy, I have but one thing to say: [excessively colorful remark excised]. And don’t give up yer day job to be a “TV” star. Maybe Horatio Algeranon will do a spoof song, set to “Video Killed The Radio Start”… ;)

    [I enjoy “Horatio’s” verse! – Ben]

    Reply ↓

  2. Ah, Willard’s “Garbage in, Garbage Out” ‘Propaganda Food of Denial Festival’, is on again.

    “One ought never to turn one’s back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half.” Winston Churchill

    Reply ↓

  3. Pingback: Another Week of GW News, November 18, 2012 – A Few Things Ill Considered

  4. How much is Anthony making out of pseudoscience… im sorry the great global warming hoax? Shouldn’t he start declaring his interests?

    Reply ↓

Leave a comment